The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries
Blog Article
However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice to the legal rights in the parties, arising out in the over marriage of your few, if any, pending before the competent court of regulation. Read more
Case legislation is specific on the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For illustration, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Lady usually do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they could do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these kinds of person(s) as provided by regulation.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that may be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. While in the meantime police shall remain neutral from the private dispute between the parties, however, if any on the individuals is indulged in criminal action the police shall choose prompt action against them under regulation. 5. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, although it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it's actually quite imprecise about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your ninety-day notice requirement, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it is actually easy for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to produce an attempt to eliminate a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's check here arrived at into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for advantage disposal when it has achieved this kind of stage. Read more
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Will you be looking for Court Information? You can utilize our site to search for your case or search for any person. Information about the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found to the search site is provided for use as reference material and is not the official court record.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance of the respondents that pensionary benefits might be withheld on account with the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established through the government.
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as being a foster child. Although the couple experienced two youthful children of their have at home, the social worker didn't inform them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report to your court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the few had youthful children.
Typically, only an appeal accepted because of the court of past vacation resort will resolve these types of differences and, For a lot of reasons, this sort of appeals in many cases are not granted.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, it is also a properly-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.